Traditional Hiring Models Are Failing SMBs

Across the world, most small and mid-sized businesses still rely on one of three hiring routes, none of which truly fits their needs.

1. DIY hiring. Leaders burn 10–20 hours per vacancy drafting job posts, reviewing CVs and screening. That’s time that could be spent on customers or product.
2. Building an in-house TA team. A full-time recruiter in the region typically costs $40-60k a year once you add payroll, visas, licences and tech.
3. Pay-per-placement agencies. Commissions average 15–30 % of first-year salary every single time you fill or back-fill a role. Agencies control the candidate data and brand experience

The price of sticking to these models is clear: CIPD’s Resourcing & Talent Planning 2024 shows 71 % of EMEA SMEs struggled to fill key roles, while 44 % cite “cost of hire” as their top HR concern.

‍

‍

What Employers Actually Want

• A steady flow of pre-qualified candidates so they can stop triaging hundreds of unfiltered applications.
• Ownership of the candidate journey which means employer branding, messaging tone and interview cadence should reflect their culture.
• Transparency & data instead of redacted CVs and hidden processes.
• Speed without friction fewer ZOOM calls, emails, follow-ups.

‍

‍

The Great Hiring Debate: Control vs. Convenience

Hiring today comes down to a trade-off: do you want full control over the process, or the convenience of outsourcing it? Most businesses don’t realise how much they’re sacrificing in either direction until it’s too late.

There are two dominant recruitment models. First, the traditional agency model, where external recruiters lead the process; it’s human-first, supported by AI and automation to help with sourcing and admin. The second is the in-house model, where full-time internal talent teams manage hiring directly, increasingly relying on AI-powered tools and platforms to streamline their workflow and decision-making.

Here we break down the two models, looking at who owns the tech and data, how costs and scalability work, where AI is applied, and, crucially, how much control you retain over your employer brand. In other words, it highlights the practical trade-offs between outsourcing the whole process to a third-party and bringing an on-site specialist into your system.

‍

The traditional agency (human-first, AI-assisted)

• Ownership: Work is completed on the agency’s ATS; employers log into their workflow.
• Candidate data: lives in the agencies CRM, often redacted, involves NDAs.
• Cost basis: you pay 15–25 % of salary every time you hire.
• Scalability: Costs climb with volume; your brand takes second place.
• AI Usage: AI typically aids the agency’s sourcing and initial screening.
• Employer-brand control: Candidate comms carry the agency’s banner; your brand comes second.

‍

In-house, managed through an ATS

• Ownership: You purchase the tools and own the process. You spend time onboarding, learning and training.
• Candidate data: All candidate records sit in your CRM
• Cost basis: salaries and overheads of staff plus licenses and subscriptions, around $5,000-$8,000 per month.
• Scalability: Seats and automations scale effortlessly
• AI usage: AI powers the entire flow
• Employer-brand control: All outreach uses your email domain, logos and tone of voice, giving you full control over the candidate experience.

‍

‍

The Ideal Hire: Tech You Own, Recruiter You Trust

At Gateway, we believe mid-level hiring in EMEA is moving toward a blended setup: you keep the tech, data and brand, while a seasoned recruiter runs the entire process within your stack. They sit in the same city, understand local nuances, speak to candidates over WhatsApp and meet you in person. You avoid payroll, visas and hardware costs, yet gain a conveyor belt of vetted talent ready for final interviews. And with your own CRM and semantic search, you can proactively headhunt without ever posting a job ad.

Gateway is the first subscription-based firm in the region to pair a world-class AI talent platform with an ex-agency recruiters based in Dubai who embed directly into the employers systems and culture. Because the recruiter works in your instance, you keep every candidate and every datapoint.

‍

Why it works

1. Cost predictability – subscription pricing is typically 50–70 % cheaper than agency spend for firms hiring >10 roles a year yet avoids the fixed payroll of building an internal TA team.
2. Compliance across diverse labour markets – the recruiter navigates UK GDPR, UAE visa quotas or KSA Saudization rules inside the client’s system, ensuring data sovereignty.
3. Cultural nuance – an on-site recruiter in Dubai can arrange WhatsApp voice notes for GCC candidates or schedule interviews outside Ramadan hours, while a partner office in Warsaw can tweak outreach for EU employment norms.
4. Data flywheel – every rejection reason, assessment score and time-to-fill feeds the client’s own analytics, steadily improving quality-of-hire benchmarks.

‍

‍

The Future of Hiring Is Hybrid

While agencies bring expertise and networks, they often keep employers at arm’s length from candidates and data. In contrast, in-house teams offer control and alignment but can be costly and hard to scale. Executive search may still warrant pure human craftsmanship, but day-to-day hiring now belongs to client-owned, human-in-the-loop AI. Evidence from across EMEA shows the hybrid model delivers faster cycles, lower costs and stronger employer brands, turning recruitment from a cost centre into a competitive edge. At Gateway, we’ve built exactly that — a blended model that gives SMBs agency-style results, with full transparency, data ownership and in-house feel.

‍

Ready to see it live?

Let’s build your hiring conveyor belt. Connect with Iain or Poya on LinkedIn, or drop us a note at

hello@gateway.work.